Jeffrey William Lewis
Global Politics Review
Vol. 2, No. 2 (October 2016): 9-27.
GPR ID: 2464-9929_v02_i02_p009
Published: 30 October 2016
Abstract: Suicide bombing remains by far the most lethal weapon readily available to terrorist groups. The systematic means by which organizations pressure individuals into becoming living bombs demand that we understand suicide bombing as a technology, an alternative and relatively inexpensive means by which militants have been able to approximate the electronic control systems of states. Such an analysis of suicide bombing is consistent with the history of technology, in which human beings have repeatedly been used as data processing units. By recognizing how and why alternative technologies such as suicide bombing have become so effective we can begin to understand why the expensive and complex weapons deployed by states are sometimes ineffective for combating insurgency resulting in a tremendous mismatch in costs incurred by the two sides. To begin closing this gap state forces must recognize that complex machinery is not necessarily superior to simple devices, and should whenever possible pursue simple, robust solutions to the challenges of modern combat rather than selecting the most expensive and complex option by default.
Keywords: suicide bombing, terrorism, technology, history, modern warfare.
Copyright by the Author. This is an Open Access article licensed by Global Politics Review under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License . // Disclaimer: the copyright and license of this article changed on October 30, 2017, when GPR became Open Access. The PDF file has not been updated for archival purposes. //